From anazo@statoil.com Fri Apr 16 07:44:39 2004
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:11:37 +0400
From: Anatoly B Zolotukhin <anazo@statoil.com>
To: aly.hamouda <aly.hamouda@his.no>
Cc: Helene Schei <helene.schei@his.no>, Marit H. Olsen <marit.h.olsen@his.no>,
     Runar.Boe@his.no, Rune W. Time <rune.time@his.no>,
     Svein M Skjaeveland <s-skj@ux.his.no>, thor.m.svartas@his.no,
     Tore T. Wiig <Tore.Wiig@his.no>
Subject: Re: Proposal for Production courses



Dear all,

What is attached here and what we've discussed earlier looks logical to me.
I support this idea of "splitting" the Spring course in 2 parts and the
Autum (further advanced course) - in 4 parts.

This will enable to avoid an intermittent teaching when one part of the
course is followed by another, followed by third and so on. At the same
time, a fisrt split in Spring and a further split in Autumn gives a better
chance for students to master their knowledge in one of four selected area.

Bets regards,
Anatoly Zolotukhin
Technical Director Statoil Russia
Paveletskaya Square 2, bld.2, Moscow 113054
Tel: +7 095 967 38 18
Fax: +7 095 967 38 24
E-mail: anazo@statoil.com


                                                                                                                   
                    aly.hamouda@h                                                                                  
                    is.no                To:     thor.m.svartas@his.no, "Rune W. Time" <rune.time@his.no>,         
                                         Runar.Boe@his.no, Helene Schei <helene.schei@his.no>, Anatoly B           
                    14.04.2004           Zolotukhin@Statoil, "Tore T. Wiig" <Tore.Wiig@his.no>, "Marit H. Olsen"   
                    12:39                <marit.h.olsen@his.no>                                                    
                                         cc:     Svein M Skjaeveland <s-skj@ux.his.no>, (bcc: Anatoly B            
                                         Zolotukhin)                                                               
                                         Subject:     Re: Proposal for Production courses                          
                                                                                                                   





This was actually just a proposal that was sent to Thor Martin and copied
Svein for his comment if it is acceptable we can, and then discuss with
group on how to proceed. So we do not go into unnecessary discussion that
would be waist of our time.

Svein points will be taken for further discussion on how to change the
proposal. In other words instead of discussing a proposal that will be
changed we should concentrate on how to move forward and discuss the detail
content of the course.

My apology to all the rest of you who are copied in my note and not
involved in the detail discussion, I just felt that we would like you to
know that this will be finalised very soon within the production group.

Thor Martin has already called for a meeting this week.
Regards,
Aly


                                                                           
 Runar                                                                     
 Bøe/TN/V                                                                  
 IT/HIS                                                                    
                                                                        To 
              Svein M Skjaeveland <s-skj@ux.his.no>                        
 14.04.20                                                               cc 
 04 10:07     aly.hamouda@his.no, Anatoly Zolotukhin <anazo@statoil.com>,  
              Helene Schei <helene.schei@his.no>, "Marit H. Olsen"         
              <marit.h.olsen@his.no>, "Rune W. Time" <rune.time@his.no>,   
              thor.m.svartas@his.no, "Tore T. Wiig" <Tore.Wiig@his.no>     
                                                                   Subject 
              Re: Proposal for Production coursesLink                      
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           






Regarding the work load for the projects in "Advanced production
technology":

Is it really the intention that the projects themselves are to count 20 SP?
The old "Prosessimulering, Prosjektoppgave" counted 2 vekttall, which is 20
% of the semester, whereas 20 SP is 67 %. I don't see how it is possible to
enlarge such a project by a factor of over 3, without making some serious
changes, which I believe there might not be enough time for.

The old "kandidatoppgave" counted 4 vekttall, i.e. 40 % of the semester.
This means that if the new projects are to be 20 SP, they will correspond
to a kandidatoppgave times 1.5.

I had the impression that around half of the course (10 SP) was supposed to
constitute the project. Has this been changed now?

Runar


                                                                           
 Svein M                                                                   
 Skjaeveland                                                               
 <s-skj@ux.his                                                             
 .no>                                                                   To 
                   aly.hamouda@his.no                                      
                                                                        cc 
 14.04.2004        thor.m.svartas@his.no, "Rune W. Time"                   
 08:11             <rune.time@his.no>, Runar.Boe@his.no, Helene Schei      
                   <helene.schei@his.no>, Anatoly Zolotukhin               
                   <anazo@statoil.com>, "Tore T. Wiig" <Tore.Wiig@his.no>, 
                   "Marit H. Olsen" <marit.h.olsen@his.no>                 
                                                                   Subject 
                   Re: Proposal for Production courses                     
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           






Aly,

A few comments before discussion in the production group:

1. The production group needs to make decisions fairly fast now, how you
want to do this.

2. There need to be a single person responsible for each module and
course. Of course, cooperation is needed, but one person should be
responsible to call the meetings and try to find solutions, etc.

3. As I mentioned to you Aly, the new rules require some sort of external
insight, see §12 in

http://www5.his.no/studiehandbok/forskrifter/forskrift_eksamen.htm

and I think, as I mentioned earlier, that there is a decision by the
previous faculty board that there should be external sensor. Please check
with Marit. Of course, this could be changed by the dean, but rules
decided by the board need to be adhered to.

Svein


*[On Sun, 11 Apr 2004, aly.hamouda@his.no wrote:]

Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 17:45:36 +0200
From: aly.hamouda@his.no
To: thor.m.svartas@his.no
Cc: Svein M Skjaeveland <s-skj@ux.his.no>
Subject: Re: Proposal for Production courses

Hi Thor Martin,

I attached a proposal for the production course. I have copied Svein, so
we can get an early indication from him what is accepted and what not,
since there are some "new elements!" related to exams, extension of
projects to Hoved Oppgave, etc. This is before we take it for discussion
within the production group.

Regards,
Aly

(See attached file: Production Technology course_suggestion1.doc)



-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you.
    [ Part 2, Application/MSWORD  43KB. ]
    [ Unable to print this part. ]

